Full List Of Cabals In Tinubu’s Government Emerges As Author Of Buhari’s Biography Speaks
Fresh controversy has emerged in Nigeria’s political space following comments by Dr. Charles Omole, author of the recently released biography of former President Muhammadu Buhari, who has alleged the existence of multiple power blocs, often referred to as cabals, within the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.
Dr. Omole made the remarks during a televised interview shortly after the launch of his book in Abuja, drawing comparisons between the internal power structure of the current government and that of the Buhari administration. His comments have since sparked intense debate across political and social platforms.
The claims followed the official unveiling of Dr. Omole’s biography on the late President Muhammadu Buhari, an event attended by top government officials and political stakeholders. While the book primarily focuses on Buhari’s life, leadership style, and legacy, Omole used the opportunity of a media appearance to reflect more broadly on governance patterns in Nigeria.
According to him, informal centres of influence are not new to Nigerian politics, but the Tinubu administration appears to have several distinct power circles operating simultaneously, unlike the more centralised structure he observed during Buhari’s tenure.
In his analysis, Dr. Omole suggested that President Tinubu sits at the centre of a core group of trusted allies and advisers who exert significant influence on state decisions. Beyond this inner circle, he pointed to other influential groups built around senior government officials and political figures.
He mentioned the presence of a strong bloc associated with the Chief of Staff to the President, Femi Gbajabiamila, which he claimed includes powerful figures within the executive arm of government. Omole also referenced a group linked to Seyi Tinubu, the president’s son, alleging that his growing political relevance has translated into influence within certain government spaces.
Additionally, the author spoke of a circle connected to the First Lady, Senator Oluremi Tinubu, whom he described as a key political figure in her own right due to her long-standing experience in governance. He further alluded to long-time associates of the president—political allies from his generation and inner political network—who, according to him, continue to shape policy directions and appointments.
Dr. Omole stressed that his observations were analytical rather than accusatory, noting that such informal structures exist in many governments globally. However, he warned that the coexistence of multiple power centres could complicate governance if not managed with transparency and strong institutions.
The comments have generated mixed reactions. While some Nigerians see Omole’s remarks as a candid reflection of political reality, others argue that labeling influential figures as “cabals” risks undermining democratic institutions and oversimplifying governance dynamics.
So far, the Presidency has not issued an official response to the claims. Political observers note that silence from government officials has only fueled further speculation and debate.
Dr. Omole also reflected on the Buhari administration, stating that although power brokers existed, they were fewer and more centralised. He argued that Buhari’s leadership style allowed a smaller inner circle to dominate decision-making, whereas the Tinubu administration appears more complex due to its broad political alliances and coalition-based structure.
These observations have added another layer to ongoing discussions about leadership styles, institutional strength, and the role of informal influence in Nigeria’s democracy.l
While Dr. Charles Omole’s claims remain his personal analysis and not an official account, they have reignited national conversation about transparency, power, and influence within Nigeria’s political system. As Nigerians continue to assess the direction of the Tinubu administration, questions surrounding who truly wields power behind the scenes are likely to remain part of the public discourse.
For now, the claims serve as a reminder of the enduring debate over governance, accountability, and the balance between formal authority and informal influence in Nigerian politics
Like Our Story ? Donate to Support Us, Click Here
You want to share a story with us? Do you want to advertise with us? Do you need publicity/live coverage for product, service, or event? Contact us on WhatsApp +16477721660 or email Adebaconnector@gmail.com
